Implementation of Ecological Solid Waste Management City Ordinance: The Case of a Component City in Southern Negros

Aims: This study determined the extent of implementation ecological solid waste management activities: generation and storage, processing resources recovery, collection transportation, disposal wastes in communities a component city Negros Occidental as assessed by implementers, barangay residents when taken whole barangays are grouped according to geographical location, population, land area, income classification. Lastly, findings were utilized formulation strategic plan for enhanced city's comprehensive program. 
 Study Design: The quantitative design particularly descriptive-comparative approach.
 Place Duration Study: was conducted Southern part Philippines during school year 2022.
 Methodology: used research utilizing survey questionnaire data collection. Only Five hundred thirteen (513) respondents participated seven (7) others refused answer questionnaire. Total enumeration employed implementers. Stratified random sampling identify community leaders each stratum be well represented. Purposive In same way, purposive conduct interviews. To analyze descriptive data, Mean, Standard Deviation, Frequency Count also used. Kruskal Wallis Mann-Whitney U tests comparative analysis. More so, general moral principles respect persons, beneficence, justice ensure ethical soundness addressed study.
 Results: result shows no significant difference population. However, found income. When it comes demographics Negros. terms respondents, 1.8% (f=9) 25.0% (f=128) 73.3% (f=193) leaders. Among three (3) majority city. Meanwhile, regards 40.0% (f=205) came from upland 37.6% stayed at mainland, 22.4% (f=115) lived coastal location. Dominantly, location obtained highest percentage among 73.9% (f=379) belonged smaller population with 5933 below, 26.1% (f=134) bigger 5934 above. that dominated study. Similarly, area (1931 below), while 26.3% (f=135) (1932 up). Finally, classification, 68.6% (f=352) lower 806880 31.4% (f=68.4) higher 8068808 up. Respondents residing lower-income areas have fewer sources living, income, resources.